From Their Own Books

Malik ibn Anas (d. 179) · al-Mudawwana · Vol. 2, p. 100 · Ijtihad

The prohibition of compulsion in marriage and its enumerated exceptions: father, master, guardian

Arabic text

لَا تُجْبَرُ عَلَى النِّكَاحِ وَلَا يُجْبِرُ أَحَدٌ أَحَدًا عَلَى النِّكَاحِ عِنْدَ مَالِكٍ إلَّا الْأَبُ فِي ابْنَتِهِ الْبِكْرِ وَفِي ابْنِهِ الصَّغِيرِ وَفِي أَمَتِهِ وَعَبْدِهِ وَالْوَلِيُّ فِي يَتِيمِهِ
Full page
قُلْتُ: أَرَأَيْتَ إنْ قَالَ: زَوِّجْنِي ابْنَتَك بِمِائَةِ دِينَارٍ عَلَى أَنْ أُزَوِّجَك ابْنَتِي بِلَا مَهْرٍ، فَفَعَلَا وَوَقَعَ النِّكَاحُ عَلَى هَذَا وَدَخَلَ كُلُّ وَاحِدٍ مِنْهُمَا بِامْرَأَتِهِ قَالَ: أَرَى أَنْ يُجَازَ نِكَاحُ الَّذِي سَمَّى لَهَا الْمَهْرَ وَيَكُونُ لَهَا مَهْرُ مِثْلِهَا وَيُفْسَخُ نِكَاحُ الَّتِي لَمْ يُسَمَّ لَهَا صَدَاقٌ دَخَلَ بِهَا أَوْ لَمْ يَدْخُلْ بِهَا قَالَ: وَقَالَ مَالِكٌ: وَالشِّغَارُ إذَا دَخَلَ بِهَا فُسِخَ النِّكَاحُ وَلَا يُقِيمُ عَلَى النِّكَاحِ عَلَى حَالٍ دَخَلَ بِهَا أَوْ لَمْ يَدْخُلْ، وَيُفْرَضُ لَهَا صَدَاقُ مِثْلِهَا وَيُفَرَّقُ بَيْنَهُمَا، قَالَ مَالِكٌ: وَشِغَارُ الْعَبِيدِ كَشِغَارِ الْأَحْرَارِ. قَالَ: فَقُلْنَا لِمَالِكٍ: فَلَوْ أَنَّ رَجُلًا زَوَّجَ ابْنَتَهُ رَجُلًا بِصَدَاقٍ مِائَةِ دِينَارٍ عَلَى أَنْ زَوَّجَهُ الْآخَرُ ابْنَتَهُ بِصَدَاقٍ خَمْسِينَ دِينَارٍ قَالَ مَالِكٌ: لَا خَيْرَ فِي ذَلِكَ وَرَآهُ مِنْ وَجْهِ الشِّغَارِ قَالَ ابْنُ الْقَاسِمِ: وَيُفْسَخُ هَذَا النِّكَاحُ مَا لَمْ يَدْخُلَا، فَإِنْ دَخَلَا لَمْ يُفْسَخْ وَكَانَ لِلْمَرْأَتَيْنِ صَدَاقُ مِثْلِهِمَا. قُلْتُ: أَرَأَيْتَ هَاتَيْنِ الْمَرْأَتَيْنِ أَيُجْعَلُ لَهُمَا الصَّدَاقُ الَّذِي سَمَّيَا، أَمْ يُجْعَلُ لَهُمَا صَدَاقُ مِثْلِهِمَا لِكُلِّ وَاحِدَةٍ مِنْهُمَا صَدَاقُ مِثْلِهَا قَالَ: قَالَ: لِي مَالِكٌ: فِي الشِّغَارِ يُفْرَضُ لِكُلِّ وَاحِدَةٍ مِنْهُمَا صَدَاقُ مِثْلِهَا إذَا وَطِئَهَا، فَأَرَى هَذَا أَيْضًا مِنْ الْوَجْهِ الَّذِي يُفْرَضُ لَهُمَا صَدَاقُ مِثْلِهِمَا وَلَا يُلْتَفَتُ إلَى مَا سَمَّيَا قَالَ سَحْنُونٌ إلَّا أَنْ يَكُونَ مَا سَمَّيَا أَكْثَرَ فَلَا يُنْقِصَا مِنْ التَّسْمِيَةِ. [إنْكَاحُ الْأَبِ ابْنَتَهُ بِغَيْرِ رِضَاهَا] قُلْتُ: أَرَأَيْتَ إنْ رَدَّتْ الرِّجَالَ رَجُلًا بَعْدَ رَجُلٍ تُجْبَرُ عَلَى النِّكَاحِ أَمْ لَا؟ قَالَ: لَا تُجْبَرُ عَلَى النِّكَاحِ وَلَا يُجْبِرُ أَحَدٌ أَحَدًا عَلَى النِّكَاحِ عِنْدَ مَالِكٍ إلَّا الْأَبُ فِي ابْنَتِهِ الْبِكْرِ وَفِي ابْنِهِ الصَّغِيرِ وَفِي أَمَتِهِ وَعَبْدِهِ وَالْوَلِيُّ فِي يَتِيمِهِ، قَالَ: وَلَقَدْ سَأَلَ رَجُلٌ مَالِكًا وَأَنَا عِنْدَهُ، فَقَالَ لَهُ: إنَّ لِي ابْنَةَ أَخٍ وَهِيَ بِكْرٌ وَهِيَ سَفِيهَةٌ وَقَدْ أَرَدْت أَنْ أُزَوِّجَهَا مَنْ يُحْصِنُهَا وَيَكْفُلُهَا فَأَبَتْ قَالَ مَالِكٌ: لَا تُزَوَّجُ إلَّا بِرِضَاهَا قَالَ: إنَّهَا سَفِيهَةٌ فِي حَالِهَا قَالَ مَالِكٌ: وَإِنْ كَانَتْ سَفِيهَةً فَلَيْسَ لَك أَنْ تُزَوِّجَهَا إلَّا بِرِضَاهَا قُلْتُ: أَرَأَيْتَ إذَا زَوَّجَ الصَّغِيرَةَ أَبُوهَا بِأَقَلَّ مِنْ مَهْرِ مِثْلِهَا أَيَجُوزُ ذَلِكَ عَلَيْهَا فِي قَوْلِ مَالِكٍ؟ قَالَ: سَمِعْت مَالِكًا يَقُولُ يَجُوزُ عَلَيْهَا إنْكَاحُ الْأَبِ، فَأَرَى أَنَّهُ إنْ زَوَّجَهَا الْأَبُ بِأَقَلَّ مِنْ مَهْرِ مِثْلِهَا أَوْ بِأَكْثَرَ فَإِنَّ ذَلِكَ جَائِزٌ إذَا كَانَ إنَّمَا زَوَّجَهَا عَلَى وَجْهِ النَّظَرِ لَهَا، قَالَ: وَلَقَدْ سَأَلْنَا مَالِكًا امْرَأَةٌ وَلَهَا ابْنَةٌ فِي حِجْرِهَا وَقَدْ طَلَّقَ الْأُمَّ زَوْجُهَا عَنْ ابْنَةٍ لَهُ مِنْهَا، فَأَرَادَ الْأَبُ أَنْ يُزَوِّجَهَا مِنْ ابْنِ أَخٍ لَهُ فَأَبَتْ فَأَتَتْ الْأُمُّ إلَى مَالِكٍ فَقَالَتْ لَهُ إنَّ لِي ابْنَةً وَهِيَ مُوسِرَةٌ مَرْغُوبٌ فِيهَا وَقَدْ أُصْدِقَتْ صَدَاقًا كَثِيرًا فَأَرَادَ أَبُوهَا أَنْ يُزَوِّجَهَا مِنْ ابْنِ أَخٍ لَهُ مُعْدَمًا لَا شَيْءَ لَهُ أَفَتَرَى أَنْ أَتَكَلَّمَ؟ قَالَ: نَعَمْ إنِّي لَأَرَى لَك فِي ذَلِكَ مُتَكَلَّمًا قَالَ ابْنُ الْقَاسِمِ: فَأَرَى أَنَّ إنْكَاحَ الْأَبِ إيَّاهَا جَائِزٌ عَلَيْهَا إلَّا أَنْ يَأْتِيَ مِنْ ذَلِكَ ضَرَرٌ فَيُمْنَعَ مِنْ ذَلِكَ

Translation

He said: She is not compelled into marriage, and in Malik's view no one may compel anyone into marriage — except the father, over his virgin daughter and his minor son; the master, over his slave woman and his slave; and the guardian, over his orphan ward.

Word by word

Each Arabic word's literal counterpart; a hyphen marks an attached suffix/particle boundary. The fluent translation is above.

she is not compelled لَا تُجْبَرُ* no one may compel anyone وَلَا يُجْبِرُ أَحَدٌ أَحَدًا* except إلَّا* the father, over his virgin daughter الْأَبُ فِي ابْنَتِهِ الْبِكْرِ* and over his minor son وَفِي ابْنِهِ الصَّغِيرِ* over his slave woman and his slave وَفِي أَمَتِهِ وَعَبْدِهِ and the guardian over his orphan ward وَالْوَلِيُّ فِي يَتِيمِهِ

Interlinear view
لَا تُجْبَرُshe is not compelledوَلَا يُجْبِرُ أَحَدٌ أَحَدًاno one may compel anyoneإلَّاexceptالْأَبُ فِي ابْنَتِهِ الْبِكْرِthe father, over his virgin daughterوَفِي ابْنِهِ الصَّغِيرِand over his minor sonوَفِي أَمَتِهِ وَعَبْدِهِover his slave woman and his slaveوَالْوَلِيُّ فِي يَتِيمِهِand the guardian over his orphan ward
  1. لَا تُجْبَرُ: Form IV passive of j-b-r: to be forced into something against one's will. The sentence is cast as a negative and a general rule.
  2. وَلَا يُجْبِرُ أَحَدٌ أَحَدًا: An indefinite subject with an indefinite object, conveying full generality; the rule is unqualified before the exception arrives.
  3. إلَّا: The particle of exception: what follows is the enumeration of what is removed from the rule's scope.
  4. الْأَبُ فِي ابْنَتِهِ الْبِكْرِ: The qualifier is virginity, not minority; in the Maliki school an adult virgin also falls under this.
  5. وَفِي ابْنِهِ الصَّغِيرِ: For the son the qualifier is minority — a father may not compel an adult son; no such qualifier is placed on the daughter.

Source

المدونة · Edition: دار الكتب العلمية الأولى، ١٤١٥ هـ - ١٩٩٤ م (٤ أجزاء) (ترقيم موافق للمطبوع)
Vol. 2 · p. 100 · Shamela live page (passage highlighted) · archive.org scan
Scan of the printed edition: Dâru'l-kütübi'l-ilmiyye, Beyrut — 1. baskı 1415/1994 (5 cilt, sonunda İbn Rüşd'ün Mukaddimât'ı) · p. 100 · 02_43334.pdf (c. 2)

Scan of vol. 2 p. 100; the PDF page index equals the printed page, no offset. The edition was verified from the volume's own copyright page: "All rights reserved to Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya — Beirut, Lebanon — first printing, 1415 AH / 1994 CE" — the printing this entry cites. The running head reads "kitab al-nikah al-awwal". The Shamela page begins and ends exactly where the printed page does ("قلت: أرأيت إن قال: زوجني ابنتك" → "إلا أن يأتي من ذلك ضرر فيمنع من ذلك"), and the sub-heading "inkah al-ab ibnatahu bi-ghayri ridaha" falls at the same point in both. The quote matches word for word.

The highlight spans three lines: the quote's first word "la" is the last word of the preceding line (the small first box covers only that), and its last word "yatimihi" ends in the middle of the third line; the comma following it lies outside the box.

Two independent checks passed on 2026-09-10: (a) page identity — the printed 100 and the running head agree with Shamela's `part`/`page_num`; (b) textual fidelity — the whole quote was read off the scan, and the box boundaries (the right edge of "la", the left edge of "yatimihi") were separately confirmed with targeted crops.

المدونة 2/100

Yellow boxes mark the lines of the quote; the scan image itself is unmodified.

Context

The passage stands under al-Mudawwana's heading 'the father giving his daughter in marriage without her consent' (vol. 2 p. 100); it is in question-and-answer form (Sahnun to Ibn al-Qasim) and transmits directly from Malik.

The same page records three things together, and all three belong to this entry. (1) The general rule: there is no compulsion in marriage — stated without qualification, as a general proposition. (2) The enumerated exceptions: the father (over his virgin daughter and his minor son), the master (over his slave woman and slave), the guardian (over his orphan ward). The absence of the qualifier 'minor' for the daughter is not accidental: in the Maliki school the father's power of compulsion extends to the adult virgin, while for the son it lapses at maturity. (3) A limit: immediately afterwards a man tells Malik he wishes to marry off his virgin niece, who is of poor judgement (safiha); twice Malik answers 'she may not be married except with her consent' — the exception belongs to the father, not to every guardian.

The last section of the page takes up the dower: if a father marries off his young daughter for less than her fair dower the contract holds; Ibn al-Qasim adds the qualifier 'provided he married her off looking to her interest' and the gloss that if harm results he is prevented.

End of the previous page
ِنْدِي، أَلَا تَرَى أَنَّ الرَّجُلَ إذَا خَالَعَ امْرَأَتَهُ عَلَى حَلَالٍ وَحَرَامٍ أُبْطِلَ الْحَرَامُ وَأُجِيزَ مِنْهُ الْحَلَالُ وَلَمْ يَكُنْ لِلزَّوْجِ غَيْرُ ذَلِكَ فَإِنْ كَانَ إنَّمَا خَالَعَهَا عَلَى حَرَامٍ كُلِّهِ مِثْلِ الْخَمْرِ وَالْخِنْزِيرِ وَالرِّبَا فَالْخُلْعُ جَائِزٌ وَلَا يَكُونُ لِلزَّوْجِ مِنْهُ شَيْءٌ وَلَا يَتْبَعُ الْمَرْأَةَ مِنْهُ بِشَيْءٍ وَإِنْ كَانَ خَالَعَهَا عَلَى ثَمَرٍ لَمْ يَبْدُ صَلَاحُهُ أَوْ عَبْدٍ لَهَا آبِقٍ أَوْ جَنِينٍ فِي بَطْنِ أُمِّهِ أَوْ الْبَعِيرِ الشَّارِدِ جَازَ ذَلِكَ وَكَانَ لَهُ أَخْذُ الْجَنِينِ إذَا وَضَعَتْهُ أُمُّهُ وَأَخْذُ الثَّمَرِ وَطَلَبُ الْعَبْدِ الْآبِقِ وَالْبَعِيرِ الشَّارِدِ وَكَذَلِكَ بَلَغَنِي عَنْ مَالِكٍ وَهُوَ رَأْيِي
Start of the next page
قُلْتُ: أَرَأَيْتَ لَوْ أَنَّ رَجُلًا زَوَّجَ ابْنَتَهُ بِكْرًا فَطَلَّقَهَا زَوْجُهَا قَبْلَ أَنْ يَبْنِيَ بِهَا أَوْ مَاتَ عَنْهَا أَيَكُونُ لِلْأَبِ أَنْ يُزَوِّجَهَا الْبِكْرَ فِي قَوْلِ مَالِكٍ؟ قَالَ: نَعَمْ، قُلْتُ: وَإِنْ بَنَى بِهَا فَطَلَّقَهَا أَوْ مَاتَ عَنْهَا قَالَ: قَالَ مَالِكٌ: إذَا بَنَى بِهَا فَهِيَ أَحَقُّ بِنَفْسِهَا. قَالَ ابْنُ الْقَاسِمِ وَلَهَا أَنْ تَسْكُنَ حَيْثُ شَاءَتْ إلَّا أَنْ يُخَافَ عَلَيْهَا الضَّيْعَةُ وَالْمَوَاضِعُ السُّوءُ أَوْ يُخَافُ عَلَيْهَا مِنْ نَفْسِهَا وَهَوَاهَا فَيَكُونُ لِلْأَبِ أَوْ لِلْوَلِيِّ أَنْ يَمْنَعَهَا مِنْ ذَلِكَ، قُلْتُ: أَرَأَيْتَ إنْ زَنَتْ فَحُدَّتْ أَوْ لَمْ تُحَدَّ أَيَكُونُ لِلْأَبِ أَنْ يُزَوِّجَهَا كَمَا يُزَوِّجُ الْبِكْر

Positions of the schools

Hanafi

A father (and grandfather) may marry off a minor boy or girl without seeking their consent; an adult woman, however, contracts her own marriage — in the Hanafi school there is no compulsion over an adult virgin.

el-Mebsût (Serahsî) c.4 s.212 — https://shamela.ws/book/5423/897
Maliki

There is no compulsion in marriage; the exceptions are the father (over his virgin daughter and minor son), the master (over his slave woman and slave) and the guardian (over his orphan ward). Because the qualifier is virginity, the power of compulsion reaches the adult daughter as well; it is not granted to any guardian other than the father. This is the page that is the subject of this entry.

el-Müdevvene c.2 s.100 — https://shamela.ws/book/587/603
Shafi'i

The father of a virgin has more right to give her in marriage than she has herself; no guardian other than a father may give a virgin in marriage until she reaches maturity.

el-Umm c.5 s.179 — https://shamela.ws/book/1655/1346
Hanbali

A father marries off his young daughter without seeking her consent, and she acquires no option on reaching maturity.

Mesâilü'l-İmâm Ahmed (Sâlih rivayeti) c.2 s.146 — https://shamela.ws/book/6106/502

How the tradition defends this

The tradition's defence runs along these lines. (1) The rule is the prohibition of compulsion: the page itself opens with 'no one may compel anyone'; the exception is narrow and enumerated, not the rule. (2) Compulsion is a duty, not a licence: Ibn al-Qasim's qualifier 'looking to her interest' and his gloss that harm bars it show the power to be reviewable; Maliki jurisprudence discusses annulling a marriage a father contracted in bad faith or to an unsuitable husband. (3) The scope is bounded: on this same page Malik refuses to let a guardian other than a father marry off even a virgin niece of poor judgement without her consent — the exception is not a door that widens. (4) The reason for the virginity qualifier: the classical rationale is the virgin's reticence to speak on the matter and her inexperience; the guardian is a conduit, not an obstacle. (5) A social argument: marriage is a contract between two families, and the guardian protects the woman from an unsuitable match. None of these defences disputes what stands on the page; all of them discuss the exception's rationale and its bounds.

Still held today?

No contemporary fatwa link added yet.

What does the Quran say?

Commentary

This section is the site's editorial view. The record above stands independently of it and can be verified on its own.

The value of this page is that it frames the ruling in the same form as the Quran's own sentence and then departs from it. The Mudawwana says 'there is no compulsion in marriage'; the Quran too, at 2:232, lays on the guardian not compulsion but non-obstruction, and at 4:19 forbids disposal karhan. The difference lies in what follows: after that rule the Mudawwana enumerates three exceptions, and the Quran enumerates none.

The qualifiers attached to the exceptions matter as well. For the son the qualifier is minority — it lapses at maturity; for the daughter it is virginity — it does not. The same page therefore accepts that a child's will becomes legally recognised at maturity in the case of a boy, and denies it in the case of a girl. Search the text for a ground for that distinction and none is found: at 4:21 the party taking the covenant is the woman, with no qualifier of virginity or widowhood; at 2:232 the verb of marrying is feminine plural and assigned to the women.

The third item on the list — the guardian over his orphan ward — meets the Quran's only explicit instruction of guardianship over an orphan head on. 4:6 describes the moment guardianship ends, and its subject is property; no authority to marry the ward off is granted. What the Quran says about orphans (4:2, 4:5, 4:6, 4:10) is from beginning to end an obligation of protection and of handing over.

The strongest text that can be urged against this reading is 24:32: the imperative 'marry off the spouseless among you' assigns the act of marrying off to the community and can be read as the basis of a law of guardianship. But the verse's subject is 'the spouseless', and the verb looks to facilitation; the removal of consent does not follow from it — and if it did, it would collide with the prohibition of obstruction at 2:232 and the prohibition of karhan at 4:19. A reading that takes 24:32 as proof of compulsion is therefore not compatible with the text.

Finally, honesty requires recording what on this page tells the other way: Malik refuses to let a guardian other than a father marry off even a virgin niece of poor judgement without her consent, and he says so twice. The consent that is the text's measure has not disappeared entirely inside the tradition; it has been suspended for one person only — the father.

Verified: 2026-09-10